🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."